President Biden Withdraws Candidate

On Thursday September 9th, 2021 President Biden withdrew his pick for the Firearms Agency. Being a president, one of the things you can count on opposition for anything you do because you are always going to offend someone. Just this past week, 9/5-9/11/2021, he's pushing a mandate for all federal employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine. This past week has also been filled with governmental employees (specifically republicans) going against the mandate calling it an "overstepping of his power". There is another group that is going to against the president and that is wonderful NRA, which is a group that we can discuss in a later blogpost. There was a particular person who said that "it is a shameful day for our country", in response to Biden withdrawing his nomination. The NRA was pushing him to get rid of the nominee and I can see why the person quoted that but I dont entirely agree. Kris Brown who is the president of Brady said that its disappointing that its 50 member who would deny the presidents choice. 

On the other side of the issue the people who were against the nomination are obviously happy. The term that they have coined from this is a critical win. Ouimet, claimed that he would be the most polarizing person that could have been in power. He does raise good points which it needs to be someone who can work with gun owners. This is fair, if you put someone in charge you want to be able for them to communicate with them so the legislation isn't at odds with the people they are representing. I also agree that it should be someone who is able to work closely with them major players in the gun community such as law enforcement and firearms. If the person is trying to control them instead of trying to help regulate them it is only going to cause them more stress and honestly wanting to rebel more. 

What do you guys think, are you disappointed with the president too or are you on the other side of the issue?

The Tweets

The meat of this blogpost is going to be about how the tweets and what they did and what other possibilities they could have done. 

#1



This tweet is obviously from Kristi Noem which the Republican governor of South Dakota, (which is a state that doesn't exist). What are you're first impression of the tweet?

#2 


This is the tweet from the other side that said they are disappointed. This was tweeted by an reform activist Guttenberg, whose daughter was killed in the Parkland Shooting. What your first impressions of the tweet.

 Final Question: Which side would you chose to to represent, without inputting your own political bias I want to see which group you would stand to represent.  





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why come for the VP?

Image
 This one is going to have a more of a personal touch to it, so lets begin..... Here are some of the claims against VICE PRESIDENT Kamala Harris: ***NYT- 10 months into her vice presidency and she has to really deliver to the administration.  ***Some lady who works for a think tank- she has been hiding this whole time and has been under the radar. ***CNN headline-  Headline Link After these outlets spoke, people in the white house moved to defend her. The press secretary stated that she is vital to the president and has addressed things such ass voting right to the causes of migration. The white house Chief of Staff said she is off the on one of the best starts of any vice president. He stated that she had mad an impact on vaccine equity and foreign policy.  Of course CNN said that the Chief of Staff is one of her biggest supporters so whatever he says is biased. They said after talking to nearly 36 people who worked close with her in the past and now, they all say t...
Read more

QAnon got a Perm!!!

Image
 For the longest QAnon was something I would always hear about but never understood, and it was something that was very prevalent during President Trumps tenure in office. To preface my definition, I want to say who it is, is a conspiracy within itself because no one truly knows. The definition that holds the most weight in my eyes is the one that, it is a person who was in the white house (between 2016-2020) who had "Q" level clearance and would go on 8chan and give out tidbits of information to followers that dealt with politics. Although it wouldn't be straight forward, it gave numbers and pieces of information every so often. Needless to say that it the most supporters between the years of 2016-2020. ***Here is an example so you aren't left to you imagination*** Now that I have given you a full overview, I want to tell you guys some of the supporters of them were also there during the capital riots of January 6th. Below is a man with "Q" on his shirt whi...
Read more

Facebook gets Cold!!??

Image
My Intro/Apology: I know its been a while sense I last posted something and that is because I got a little lazy, but its fine because I got a double dose for you guys. The interesting this is that I log onto my computer and put in a random news website that popped in my head and Facebook is the top headline, published 8 minutes ago. Both Facebook and the January 6th riots are paying my bills when it comes to getting this done, they always have something going on.  Now Back to the Information: So I know you guys remember about a year ago when the vaccine began to come out and their was a group of people wanted them, hated them, and didn't care. Along with the hateful people came a bunch of their own misconceptions about the newly acquired vaccine. To combat this Facebook literally pushed this kind of information further down peoples feed. One group stated that the reason they didn't do what was mentioned above was they are all about "HUMAN ENGAGEMENT + EYEBALLS = Ad REVENUE...
Read more